{"id":2225,"date":"2026-08-26T03:16:04","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T03:16:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/uncategorized\/china-supplier-production-yield-evidence\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T03:16:04","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T03:16:04","slug":"china-supplier-production-yield-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/uncategorized\/china-supplier-production-yield-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Review Production-Yield and Loss Evidence From China Suppliers Before Shipment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A supplier can report that an order is finished while key quantity questions remain unanswered. How many units were planned? How many were produced as good output? How many became samples, rework, scrap, inspection rejects, holds, or packing loss? Which number is ready to ship? A percentage on its own does not explain these questions. Buyers need a reconciliation that uses the same product scope, unit of measure, and production record.<\/p>\n<p><strong>China supplier production yield evidence<\/strong> is a buyer review of the supplier&#8217;s stated planned quantity, actual good output, and documented quantity movements for a defined production run. It can connect a work order or traveler to inputs, output, samples, rework, scrap, holds, packed quantity, and a supplier-defined loss explanation. It does not establish a correct yield target, product conformity, cost accuracy, inventory accuracy, root cause, absence of theft, process capability, regulatory compliance, or shipment release.<\/p>\n<p>In pharmaceutical manufacturing, 21 CFR 211.103 requires actual yields and percentages of theoretical yield to be determined at each appropriate production, processing, packaging, or holding phase, with independent verification as specified.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-21\/chapter-I\/subchapter-C\/part-211\/subpart-F\/section-211.103\" title=\"Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 211.103 Calculation of Yield\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1<\/a> Section 211.188 requires pharmaceutical batch records to include actual and percentage theoretical yield at appropriate phases, as well as records for components, in-process results, equipment and lines, and investigations.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-21\/chapter-I\/subchapter-C\/part-211\/subpart-J\/section-211.188\" title=\"Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 211.188 Batch Production and Control Records\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2<\/a> FDA&#8217;s Q7A guidance states that deviations from established procedures should be documented and explained, with critical deviations investigated in its API GMP context.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/q7a-good-manufacturing-practice-guidance-active-pharmaceutical-ingredients\" title=\"FDA, Q7A Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> Those authorities do not set ordinary yield rules for China suppliers. They support a buyer discipline: set a clear quantity baseline, reconcile actual movements within the same scope, preserve the source record, and ask for a controlled explanation where quantities do not reconcile.<\/p>\n<h2>Define the run, unit, and expected basis<\/h2>\n<p>Do not start with a percentage. Start with the production event the supplier is reporting. A yield or loss record can be misleading when it combines parts from different orders, compares pieces with sets, treats a packed unit as a manufactured unit, or uses an unknown conversion. The buyer and supplier should describe the scope before discussing the result.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Scope field<\/th>\n<th>Supplier record<\/th>\n<th>Buyer question<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Buyer SKU and revision<\/td>\n<td>Work order, traveler, or controlled product reference<\/td>\n<td>Which exact product baseline is included?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Production run or lot<\/td>\n<td>Supplier production-event identifier<\/td>\n<td>Which run does the reconciliation cover?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Process phase<\/td>\n<td>Cutting, molding, assembly, test, packing, or another defined phase<\/td>\n<td>Where was the quantity measured?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unit of measure<\/td>\n<td>Pieces, sets, kilograms, cartons, or another defined unit<\/td>\n<td>Are all compared numbers in the same unit?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Planned quantity<\/td>\n<td>PO, schedule, or work-order target<\/td>\n<td>What did the supplier intend to produce?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Input basis<\/td>\n<td>Issued components, work-in-process, or supplier-defined starting quantity<\/td>\n<td>What is the reconciliation starting point?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Expected basis<\/td>\n<td>Approved BOM, route, conversion, or supplier-defined theoretical basis<\/td>\n<td>How did supplier calculate the comparison?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Reporting date<\/td>\n<td>Time and status of the reconciliation<\/td>\n<td>Is the record final or still changing?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A buyer may need more than one reconciliation. An assembly run can use components, make semi-finished units, reject some units in test, rework others, and then pack finished goods into cartons. Keep each phase visible rather than forcing every movement into one percentage.<\/p>\n<h2>Ask for quantity movements, not a headline yield<\/h2>\n<p>A supplier&#8217;s report should show where the quantity went. The exact categories will vary by product and factory. The buyer does not need a universal loss code list, but it should require enough categories to distinguish goods that are available from goods that are still under review or were removed from the production scope.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Quantity category<\/th>\n<th>Meaning in buyer review<\/th>\n<th>Supporting record<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Planned quantity<\/td>\n<td>Supplier&#8217;s stated production target<\/td>\n<td>PO, schedule, or work order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Issued or starting quantity<\/td>\n<td>Input to the defined phase<\/td>\n<td>Material issue, kit, traveler, or prior phase record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Good output<\/td>\n<td>Supplier-stated acceptable output at that phase<\/td>\n<td>Traveler, in-process record, or inspection evidence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Samples<\/td>\n<td>Units removed for approved or supplier-defined sample use<\/td>\n<td>Sample issue or test record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rework pending<\/td>\n<td>Units assigned to an authorized or supplier-defined rework path<\/td>\n<td>Rework authorization and status<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scrap or loss<\/td>\n<td>Units supplier records as no longer available for the stated output<\/td>\n<td>Scrap, defect, or loss record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inspection hold<\/td>\n<td>Units restricted pending a result or decision<\/td>\n<td>Hold or nonconformance record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Packed quantity<\/td>\n<td>Units assigned to final packing scope<\/td>\n<td>Packing list, carton plan, or packing record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Remaining balance<\/td>\n<td>Units still expected to be accounted for<\/td>\n<td>Reconciliation exception record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The categories should not be used to hide an unresolved gap. If the supplier cannot explain a balance, it should appear as open rather than being silently added to scrap, rework, or good output.<\/p>\n<h2>Compare like with like<\/h2>\n<p>A common error is to compare a quantity at one stage with a quantity at another. For example, 1,000 component pieces may not equal 1,000 finished sets. A carton count may not equal a unit count. A buyer should ask for the defined conversion or bill-of-material basis before interpreting a loss.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Comparison<\/th>\n<th>Require<\/th>\n<th>Do not assume<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Components to finished units<\/td>\n<td>BOM or conversion reference<\/td>\n<td>One component always equals one finished unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Good output to packed quantity<\/td>\n<td>Defined packing scope and timing<\/td>\n<td>All good output is already packed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rework to final output<\/td>\n<td>Rework record and final disposition<\/td>\n<td>Rework automatically became good output<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Samples to issue record<\/td>\n<td>Sample scope and purpose<\/td>\n<td>Samples are production scrap<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hold quantity to release decision<\/td>\n<td>Hold ID and current status<\/td>\n<td>Held goods are available to ship<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scrap to loss record<\/td>\n<td>Supplier-defined reason and scope<\/td>\n<td>Scrap indicates a defect root cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Carton count to unit count<\/td>\n<td>Pack-out basis<\/td>\n<td>Every carton contains the same quantity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Yield percentage to quantity table<\/td>\n<td>Numerator, denominator, and unit<\/td>\n<td>A percentage has a consistent basis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The buyer should request simple arithmetic that can be followed. For a defined phase, the reconciliation could show: starting quantity equals good output plus sample units plus rework pending plus scrap or loss plus hold quantity plus any stated remaining balance. This is an accounting identity for the supplier&#8217;s report, not a product or process specification.<\/p>\n<h2>Keep source records connected<\/h2>\n<p>A yield summary is more credible when it links to the underlying production record. Section 211.188 illustrates the principle in a pharmaceutical context by tying batch records to components, equipment, in-process controls, yield, and investigations.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-21\/chapter-I\/subchapter-C\/part-211\/subpart-J\/section-211.188\" title=\"Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 211.188 Batch Production and Control Records\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2<\/a> A supplier producing general goods can provide a much narrower evidence package, but the buyer should still be able to see the source of each important category.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Reconciliation item<\/th>\n<th>Link to request<\/th>\n<th>Buyer boundary<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Planned run<\/td>\n<td>Work order or production schedule<\/td>\n<td>Does not prove contract compliance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Starting or issued quantity<\/td>\n<td>Traveler, kit record, or prior phase log<\/td>\n<td>Does not verify material quality<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Good output<\/td>\n<td>In-process, test, or supplier quality record<\/td>\n<td>Does not establish final conformity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rework<\/td>\n<td>Authorization, work record, and current status<\/td>\n<td>Does not approve the rework<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scrap or loss<\/td>\n<td>Supplier loss record and scope<\/td>\n<td>Does not establish root cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Samples<\/td>\n<td>Sample log or test reference<\/td>\n<td>Does not approve sample use<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hold quantity<\/td>\n<td>Hold ID, location, and status<\/td>\n<td>Does not determine disposition<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Packed quantity<\/td>\n<td>Packing record and carton plan<\/td>\n<td>Does not prove cargo handover<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Open balance<\/td>\n<td>Exception record and owner<\/td>\n<td>Does not identify fault<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A buyer does not need every internal factory log. It needs a clear reference that allows the supplier&#8217;s stated quantities to be traced to relevant records when the order risk or discrepancy warrants follow-up.<\/p>\n<h2>Treat yield differences as a question, not a verdict<\/h2>\n<p>A difference between planned and actual output can result from many events: supplier setup loss, in-process failure, sample use, count correction, a material issue, an approved rework path, packaging damage, or an incomplete run. The number alone does not prove poor quality, fraud, or a cause. Ask the supplier to classify the event and provide the controlling record.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Reported difference<\/th>\n<th>Buyer request<\/th>\n<th>Appropriate boundary<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Lower good output<\/td>\n<td>Actual output, affected scope, and supplier explanation<\/td>\n<td>Do not infer root cause from percentage alone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Higher output<\/td>\n<td>Order scope, excess status, and packing plan<\/td>\n<td>Do not assume excess is available to ship<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>High sample use<\/td>\n<td>Sample record, purpose, and approval path<\/td>\n<td>Do not treat samples as scrap automatically<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rework quantity rises<\/td>\n<td>Rework authorization and verification status<\/td>\n<td>Do not release reworked product without evidence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scrap category changes<\/td>\n<td>Original and revised record with reason<\/td>\n<td>Do not overwrite the earlier classification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hold remains open<\/td>\n<td>Hold ID, physical or system status, and owner<\/td>\n<td>Do not include held units as shipping-ready<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Count correction<\/td>\n<td>Original count, corrected count, and evidence<\/td>\n<td>Do not erase the original entry<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Balance unexplained<\/td>\n<td>Open exception and follow-up owner<\/td>\n<td>Do not force an artificial closeout<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>FDA&#8217;s Q7A guidance is specific to active pharmaceutical ingredients, but its documentation principle is useful: deviations should be recorded and explained, and critical deviations should be investigated in the relevant context.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/q7a-good-manufacturing-practice-guidance-active-pharmaceutical-ingredients\" title=\"FDA, Q7A Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> For a sourcing buyer, the practical result is a controlled exception record rather than a verbal explanation in chat.<\/p>\n<h2>Separate production yield from cost, capability, and acceptance<\/h2>\n<p>Yield data can inform a buyer conversation, but it does not answer every commercial or technical question. A low yield may affect schedule or available quantity. It does not, by itself, establish a unit cost adjustment, warranty claim, process capability, engineering failure, or product rejection.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Topic<\/th>\n<th>Yield evidence can support<\/th>\n<th>Yield evidence cannot establish alone<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Available quantity<\/td>\n<td>Supplier-stated good, held, rework, and packed scope<\/td>\n<td>Final shipment release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schedule follow-up<\/td>\n<td>Whether the run needs more production<\/td>\n<td>A guaranteed completion date<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Loss discussion<\/td>\n<td>Where supplier recorded quantity movement<\/td>\n<td>Root cause or responsibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inspection planning<\/td>\n<td>Whether a quantity category needs review<\/td>\n<td>Product conformity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Cost discussion<\/td>\n<td>A factual starting point for a commercial conversation<\/td>\n<td>Price adjustment or liability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Process review<\/td>\n<td>A recurring discrepancy signal<\/td>\n<td>Process capability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inventory follow-up<\/td>\n<td>A stated balance for the defined run<\/td>\n<td>Full inventory accuracy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Supplier performance<\/td>\n<td>One element of a broader evidence review<\/td>\n<td>Overall supplier rating<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Keep qualified owners responsible for technical, commercial, legal, and release decisions. The buyer&#8217;s reconciliation should describe the evidence available and what remains open.<\/p>\n<h2>Use status controls before shipment<\/h2>\n<p>A production run can be complete while the quantity reconciliation is incomplete. Define the status terms that the supplier will use so a shipment record does not quietly include held, unverified, or unaccounted units.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Status<\/th>\n<th>Meaning for buyer review<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Reconciliation in progress<\/td>\n<td>Supplier has not closed the defined quantity record<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Supplier-stated output complete<\/td>\n<td>Supplier reports production output for the phase is complete<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rework pending<\/td>\n<td>Identified units remain in a controlled rework path<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hold open<\/td>\n<td>Units remain restricted pending a decision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Packed pending reconciliation<\/td>\n<td>Packing has begun or finished but quantity comparison remains open<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Supplier-stated reconciled<\/td>\n<td>Supplier reports its defined categories reconcile for stated scope<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Exception open<\/td>\n<td>A mismatch, gap, or record issue remains unresolved<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Buyer review pending<\/td>\n<td>Buyer-controlled decision remains separate from supplier status<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Do not convert supplier-stated reconciled into an acceptance, payment, or shipment release decision. The buyer may still need final inspection, packaging review, cargo handover evidence, commercial confirmation, or another agreed control.<\/p>\n<h2>Supplier request wording and FAQ<\/h2>\n<blockquote>\n<p>For [SKU, revision, work order or lot, supplier site, process phase, planned quantity, unit of measure, and reporting date], provide a production-yield and loss reconciliation before shipment review. Identify the planned or starting basis, actual good output, samples, rework pending, scrap or supplier-defined loss, hold quantity, packed quantity, and remaining balance using the same defined unit and scope. Link material or traveler records, inspection evidence, sample records, rework authorizations, holds, nonconformance records, and packing evidence where relevant. Record any quantity discrepancy, count correction, reclassification, missing record, or open balance through a controlled exception path. Buyer review does not set a loss target or establish product conformity, cost accuracy, process capability, compliance, root cause, or shipment release.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2>What is China supplier production yield evidence?<\/h2>\n<p>It is a supplier record set that explains how quantities moved through a defined production scope. It compares the planned or starting basis with actual good output, samples, rework, loss, holds, packed goods, and an open balance where applicable.<\/p>\n<h2>Is a yield percentage enough to approve a shipment?<\/h2>\n<p>No. A percentage needs a defined numerator, denominator, unit, phase, and source record. It does not prove product conformity, packing accuracy, cargo handover, or final shipment readiness.<\/p>\n<h2>What should a buyer do when quantities do not reconcile?<\/h2>\n<p>Ask the supplier to identify the affected run, unit, categories, supporting records, and exception owner. Keep the difference open until the supplier provides controlled evidence or the appropriate owner makes a decision.<\/p>\n<h2>Is scrap always a quality defect?<\/h2>\n<p>No. A supplier may use its own categories for setup loss, damage, count correction, rejected units, or other events. The buyer should ask what the category means for the defined run rather than assume a cause.<\/p>\n<h2>Should rework be included in good output?<\/h2>\n<p>Not until the supplier&#8217;s agreed rework and verification path records its status. Keep rework pending separate from good output unless the controlling record shows the disposition used for the reconciliation.<\/p>\n<h2>Make quantity movements visible before shipment<\/h2>\n<p><strong>China supplier production yield evidence<\/strong> helps buyers review whether the supplier&#8217;s planned run, good output, samples, rework, scrap, holds, and packed quantity point to a coherent production record. The supplier defines the unit and run scope, links critical categories to source records, and keeps discrepancies visible through a controlled exception path.<\/p>\n<p>Start with one production run that has a clear work order and unit of measure. Agree the quantity categories, source records, reconciliation timing, and exception owner before the supplier reports production complete. That process helps distinguish an open quantity question from a shipment-ready quantity.<\/p>\n<p>Supplier Ally can help buyers organize supplier production records, yield reconciliations, inspection follow-up, rework and hold evidence, packing coordination, and shipment documentation. For engineering, technical, cost, accounting, legal, regulatory, product-compliance, or final release decisions, use the appropriate qualified owner before acting.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Review China supplier production yield evidence to reconcile planned input, good output, samples, rework, scrap, holds, and packed quantity before shipment.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"trp-custom-language-flag":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Azar Pamir","author_link":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/author\/admin\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Review China supplier production yield evidence to reconcile planned input, good output, samples, rework, scrap, holds, and packed quantity before shipment.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supplierally.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}